%@ LANGUAGE="VBSCRIPT" %>
|
Aerationenhanced bioremediation of oilcontaminated soils: a laboratory treatability study
Charles A. Crocetti, Charles L. Head, and Albert J. Ricciardelli; GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. |
ABSTRACT
The results of a laboratory treatability study are
presented which indicate that diesel fuel oil-contaminated soils
(up to C20) may be successfully bioremediated by insitu
forced aeration. Oxygen was determined to be the limiting factor
for the biodegradation of these petroleum hydrocarboncontaminated
soils. Nutrient addition and associated costly nutrient amendment
delivery to the subsurface was determined to be unnecessary.
Oxygen can be provided to subsurface soils cost effectively by
using a blower, and air extraction and air inlet wells.
Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarboncontaminated
soils is accomplished with insitu forced aeration by providing
oxygen to the indigenous subsurface microbes, thus accelerating
aerobic biodegradation of the contaminants into carbon dioxide
and water. Average densities of heterotrophic bacteria were observed
to be one to two orders of magnitude higher in oilcontaminated
soils than in background soils. These elevated microbial densities
suggest that native soil bacteria are already degrading oil contamination
and that the greatest impediment to more rapid biodegradation
may be the supply of oxygen, which can be quickly used up by active
biological populations and not replenished in the subsurface without
a means of constant air supply.
The biotreatability study indicated that approximately
four to eight percent of the petroleum hydrocarbon mass was biodegraded
over the course of the 2month testing period. The amount
of hydrocarbon degraded was evaluated by measuring the amount
of carbon dioxide which was produced as samples of fuel oilcontaminated
soil were aerated with carbon dioxidefree air. Not surprisingly,
direct chemical analysis of portions of the treated soils before
and after the treatability study proved less informative due to
the inherent heterogeneity of soil contamination. The costs projected
to remediate the soils by forced aeration are estimated to be
about onehalf of those projected to remediate the soils
by excavation and treatment or disposal.
BACKGROUND
A multiphase hydrogeologic and environmental
evaluation of a site located at a major retail shopping mall in
the northeastern United States. It was concluded that petroleum
hydrocarbon compound (PHC)contaminated soils existed over
an area of approximately 5,000 square feet (in plan view) in the
vicinity of a former underground storage tank (UST), once located
northwest of a department store. The tank served a former concrete
company facility which was razed during mall construction. Based
on the results of petroleum hydrocarbon fingerprinting analysis,
these PHCs appeared to be an unweathered to slightly weathered
No. 2/diesel fuel oil. Figure 1 shows the location of the former
UST and the extent of oilcontaminated soils.
Soil conditions in the area of PHC contamination
consist of approximately 5 to 10 feet of sandy fill material,
overlying 30 to 40 feet of sand and gravel with about 10 to 20
percent silt. Relatively impermeable crystalline bedrock underlies
the sand and gravel. The observed groundwater table was approximately
10 feet above the bedrock surface, resulting in a vadose zone
which extends to a depth of approximately 30 to 40 feet below
the ground surface. Observed oil contamination was generally
restricted to the sand and gravel, and commonly extended throughout
much of the thickness of the vadose zone and into the upper portion
of the saturated zone. A typical subsurface profile across the
area of oilcontaminated soils is presented as Figure 2.
DESCRIPTION, AND BASIS FOR SELECTION, OF AERATION-ENHANCED IN-SITU BIOREMEDIATION
State clean-up goals for fuel oil-contaminated soils
are 100 parts per million (ppm) total petroleum hydrocarbons,
and 1.0 ppm total benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX).
These goals are similar to those established by many other State
agencies (Bell, 1990). Based on the observed site hydrogeologic
conditions, the type and distribution of contaminant, and site
operational constraints, aeration-enhanced in-situ bioremediation
remediation was selected as the preferred remedial option. The
depth to the bottom of contamination (up to about 40 feet) and
the location of the area of contamination directly adjacent to
active mall buildings, precluded cost-effective excavation and
treatment/disposal of the soils.
The availability of oxygen is commonly the limiting
factor in biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons and other contaminants
in the subsurface. Active contaminant degrading microbial populations
are commonly present in the subsurface, as are sufficient quantities
of nutrients (e.g., nitrogen, phosphorous) (Calabrese and Kostrecki,
1991). However, the absence of sufficient oxygen supply causes
the subsurface environment to become anoxic, and causes microbes
to function in a less efficient anaerobic manner. When oxygen
is added to the subsurface establishing oxic conditions, facultative
heterotrophs (facultative microbes capable of both aerobic
and anaerobic metabolism, and heterotrophs derive their
energy from oxidation of organic carbon compounds) will convert
from anaerobic to aerobic metabolism, and more efficiently and
quickly degrade the petroleum hydrocarbons.
It was proposed to implement insitu bioremediation
by the process of forced aeration using a series of air extraction
and air inlet supply wells, driven by a blower system similar
to that used for the venting of volatiles from soils. Unlike
simple venting of volatiles, however, the objective of the forced
aeration was to remove the petroleum hydrocarbon contamination
by providing oxygen to the microbes in the subsurface (accelerating
aerobic bioremediation), and removing the carbon dioxide and water
which are the end products of the hydrocarbon degradation. The
first phase of the proposed remedial program was performance of
a laboratory treatability study which is the focus of this paper.
OBJECTIVES OF LABORATORY TREATABILITY STUDY
Information in the literature indicates the PHCs
identified at the site can biodegrade if site conditions are appropriate
(Overcash and Pal, 1979). To confirm whether soil conditions
at the site are conducive to biodegradation, a laboratory scale
treatability study was conducted. The purpose of this study was
twofold:
Note that the purpose of this study was not to optimize
the rate of biodegradation, but rather to assess whether bioremediation
via forced aeration could be used to remediate the contaminated
soils in-situ.
Bacterial enumerations were also performed on several
soil samples collected from the site. The purpose of these bacterial
counts was to assess the population density of indigenous, heterotrophic
bacteria in the contaminated soils and in background soils. The
results of these bacterial enumerations would augment the laboratory
study in providing a general indication as to the likelihood of
success for bioremediation.
COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
Soil samples were collected from four test borings
drilled in the vicinity of the location of the former fuel oil
UST. Soil samples were also collected from another test boring
located approximately 100 feet southwest of the location of the
former UST to characterize background conditions. Test boring
locations are indicated on Figure 1.
Soil samples for bacterial enumeration were collected
"aseptically" so as to limit the potential for contamination
of the samples by non-indigenous bacteria. Splitspoon samplers
were prepared for sampling as follows: 1) sampling implements
were washed and scrubbed using Extran, a nonphosphate, laboratorygrade
detergent, 2) implements were rinsed with tap wafer followed by
distilled water, and 3) implements were assembled and then rinsed
with isopropyl alcohol, a 10-percent bleach solution, and sterilized
distilled water. Samples were transferred from the split-spoon
to presterilized plastic bags, placed immediately in an
icepacked cooler, and transported to a laboratory for microbial
enumeration.
Table 1 includes the results of two types of analyses
on these soil samples: 1) EPA Method 418.1, a spectrophotometric/infrared
method that measures total PHC content, and 2) Modified ASTM Method
D3328 (similar to EPA Method 8100), a gas chromatographic method
that also measures total PHC content.
At the time of the analyses, Method 418.1 was required
by the NHDES for analysis of soil contaminated with fuel oiltype
PHCs. Modified ASTM Method D3328 was performed because it is
generally considered to be less weathering prone to interference,
and it provides a more accurate representation of actual hydrocarbon
concentrations. This method also provides an indication as to
the type of PHC and degree of weathering.
Observed PHC concentrations within soil samples were
typically in the range of approximately 1,000 to 10,000 ppm.
The characteristics of the chromatograms produced by the Modified
ASTM Method D3328 indicate the presence of a petroleum product
with a chromatogram similar to No. 2/diesel fuel oil; the phytane/nC
18 ratios range from 0.36 to 0.76 (average value 0.52) and indicate
that this petroleum product is generally slightly weathered.
These results are consistent with those previously obtained in
this area. Selected soil samples were analyzed for volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) using EPA Method 8240. Additionally, three samples
were screened for VOCs using a gas chromatograph headspace technique.
The results of these analyses indicate the presence of acetone
in the 0.1 to 200 ppm range. Previous analysis of soil samples
from this area also indicated the occasional presence of low levels
(up to 0.7 ppm) of toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, 1,1,1trichloroethane,
and 1,2dichloroethene. The presence of the aromatic hydrocarbons
toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes is consistent with the presence
of fuel oil contamination. The source of the other VOCs is unclear.
BACTERIAL ENUMERATIONS
A laboratory was engaged to conduct enumerations
of heterotrophic bacteria on four soil samples collected at the
site. The bacterial enumerations were conducted using the serial
dilution plate method technique. The results of these enumerations
are summarized on Table 2. Average bacterial density in soil
samples contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons (TSS2S2A,
TSS4S2A) is one to two orders of magnitude higher than that
of background samples (TSS5S1, TSS5S2A). The elevated
population densities of bacteria in the contaminated soil samples
suggest that native soil bacteria are currently biodegrading the
PHC contamination and that, therefore, the contaminated soils
are amenable to bioremediation. The higher bacterial counts indicate
that soil conditions are not inhibitory to microbial growth, and
that contaminant levels are sufficient to support a viable population
of PHCdegrading bacteria. It is likely, therefore, that
the greatest impediment to more rapid biodegradation is the supply
of oxygen, which is quickly used up in the subsurface without
a means of constant air supply.
BIOTREATABILITY STUDY
EXPERIMENT PROCEDURE
The extent of aerobic biodegradation was assessed
by monitoring the evolution of carbon dioxide, a primary product
of hydrocarbon degradation. The evolved carbon dioxide was collected
onto an adsorbent medium for subsequent gravimetric measurement.
The amount of hydrocarbon biodegraded was estimated using the
relative molecular weights of carbon dioxide and the PHCs.
Figure 3 shows the experimental apparatus used for
the study. Laboratory air enters the apparatus through a pressure
regulator and passes through the following for conditioning and
flow control:
In each test flask, the air enters near the soil
surface (at the bottom of the flask) and exits close to the top
of the flask. The air exiting each test flask passes through
a calcium sulfate scrubber to remove water followed by two caustic
scrubbers in series to adsorb the biologically evolved carbon
dioxide.
Four test flasks were run for this study. These
included:
The amount of carbon dioxide evolved from each flask
was measured periodically (daily to semiweekly) for a period
of nine weeks. Following completion of the study, the amount
of hydrocarbons remaining in the two test flasks was measured
on samples from each flask.
EXPERIMENT RESULTS
The amount of hydrocarbons biodegraded from each
test flask was calculated from the amount of carbon dioxide which
was evolved. For simplification, these calculations assume that
all biodegraded hydrocarbons had the same molecular weight to
carbon atom ratio. Deviations from this assumption are likely
minor because the ratio of molecular weight to carbon atoms does
not vary substantially for the compounds of interest.
Specifically, it was assumed that hydrocarbons present
in the soil exist in the molecular form HC, which represents are
relatively conservative estimate regarding the amount of carbon
dioxide evolved in relation to the mass of hydrocarbon degraded.
Under proper environmental conditions, hydrocarbons will biodegrade
as follows:
TABLE 1 HYDROCARBON CONTENT OF SOIL SAMPLES
Sample ID
Sample Depth
(feet below ground surface)Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Content (ppm)
Analytical Method
TSS1-S1
5-11
6,200
EPA 418.1
3,800
Modified ASTM D3328
TSS1-S2
11-13
11,000
EPA 418.1
14,000 (duplicate)
EPA 418.1
4,500
Modified ASTM D3328
TSS2-S1
5-7
3,400
Modified ASTM D3328
6,500
EPA 418.1
6,300 (duplicate)
EPA 418.1
TSS4-S1
5-7
1,400
EPA 418.1
520
Modified ASTM D3328
TSS4-S2
7-12
1,600
EPA 418.1
850
Modified ASTM D3328
TSS5-S1
5-7
190
EPA 418.1
67 (duplicate)
EPA 418.1
26
Modified ASTM D3328
TABLE 2 - BACTERIA ENUMERATION
Sample Designation
Sample Depth
(feet below ground surface)Bacterial Population Density (Mean CFU+/-S.D. per g DW soil)
TSS2-S2A
7-9
2.9+/-1.5x105
TSS4-S2A
7-9
3.4+/-1.3x106
TSS5-S1
5-7
5.9+/-0.4x103
TSS5-S2A
7-9
2.3+/-1.0x105
This equation indicates that four carbon dioxide
(CO2) molecules (44 g/mole) are evolved for every four
hydrocarbon (HC) molecules (13 g/mole) completely degraded (or
mineralized).
As a result, 44 g of CO2 are produced for every 13
g HC degraded, or the mass of hydrocarbon mineralized equals (13/44)
times the mass of CO2 evolved.
Figure 4 presents the calculated cumulative amount of hydrocarbons mineralized from each test flask during the laboratory study. These amounts were estimated by first subtracting out the carbon dioxide collected from the background soil test flask. Approximately 107 milligram (mg) of hydrocarbons were mineralized from test flask TSS2S 1, and approximately 61 mg of hydrocarbons were degraded from test flask TSS 1S2.
Chemical analysis by Modified ASTM D3328 of portions of the soil samples used in the study, both before and after the study, are presented in Table 3. Analysis of sample TSS2S 1 showed a decrease in PHCs of 900 ppm (equivalent to the degradation of approximately 360 mg of hydrocarbons in the 400 g sample). Analysis of sample TSS 1S2 showed an increase in PHCs of 300 ppm (equivalent to an addition of approximately 120 mg of hydrocarbons in the 400 g sample).
| TABLE 3 - REDUCTION IN TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATION | |||
| Sample ID | Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Concentration (ppm) | ||
| Before Study (02/05/91) | After Study (05/08/91) | Change in Concentration | |
| TSS1-S2 | 4,500 | 4,800 | +300 |
| TSS2-S1 | 3.400 | 2,500 | -900 |
The somewhat inconsistent chemical analysis (PHC) results presented above are not unexpected considering the inherent heterogeneity of contaminant concentrations in soils. That is, soil contamination is inherently heterogeneous relative to the size of the soil sample analyzed. Therefore, the results of chemical analyses of a soil sample may vary significantly depending upon specifically which portion of the sample is analyzed. As such, the chemical analysis results are considered less meaningful with regard to an assessment of the potential success of bioremediation than the abovedescribed measured cumulative amounts of hydrocarbons which were actually degraded.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Based on the above results, it was estimated that
approximately 4 to 8 percent of the hydrocarbon mass was mineralized
from the samples within the test flasks over the approximate nineweek
testing period. This should be a conservative estimate of the
amount that was biodegraded, since during the initial stages of
bioremediation a substantial amount of the hydrocarbons biodegraded
is likely incorporated into cell mass and not evolved as carbon
dioxide. In summary, the following conclusions were drawn:
The length of time for enhanced biodegradation to attain the desired level of contaminant reduction is difficult to assess at this point. Inherent limitations in extrapolating short duration laboratory tests to actual full-scale in-situ conditions include: 1 ) the representativeness of the soil samples selected for the laboratory tests, 2) varying conditions in the subsurface (e.g., temperature, humidity), and 3) the ability to evenly distribute oxygen (air) through the subsurface. Further refinement in the estimate of time required to effect remediation will likely be possible subsequent to fieldscale pilot testing and startup of the fullscale system.
REFERENCES
Bell, C.E., 1990, StateByState Summary
of Cleanup Standards, Analysis, Monitoring, Remediation - Soils.
NovemberDecember, 1990.
Calabrese, E.J., and Kostrecki, P.T., 1991, Hydrocarbon
Contaminated Soils, Volume I, Lewis Publishers, Inc.
Overcash, M.R., and Pal, D., 1979, Design of Land
Treatment Systems for Industrial Wastes Theory and Practice,
Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, Michigan.